buildd and archive.ubuntu.com
Colin Watson
cjwatson at ubuntu.com
Tue Jun 7 04:58:16 CDT 2005
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Am Tuesday 07 June 2005 11:04 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:38:13AM +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > Ok, yesterday night between 20:00 UTC and 22:00 UTC i uploaded
> > > libbonobomm1.3-1.3.8-2.2ubuntu1 to the buildd.
> > >
> > > It compiled successfully on all archs,but never showed up in the
> > > archives. But, the source diffs are already on archive.ubuntu.com
> > > (libbonobomm1.3_1.3.8-2.2ubuntu1.diff.gz
> > > libbonobomm1.3_1.3.8-2.2ubuntu1.dsc)
> > > Can someone check, what's going on there? thx :=
> >
> > All uploads that ship new binary package names need to go through the
> > NEW queue for manual checking. libbonobomm1.3 is there at the moment.
>
> Well, it was an version "update" to an already existing package.
It contains new binary package names, so it goes through NEW regardless.
> > > The other strange thing is libccrtp.
> > > There is a new debian package, it's mentioned on bugzilla.
> > > but right now, we're trying to sync and build the old version
> > > (which is failing)
> >
> > It's got a version number matching *ubuntu* in breezy, so it isn't
> > automatically synced. Somebody needs to merge the Ubuntu changes, or
> > ask elmo to sync the new version if the Ubuntu changes are no longer
> > relevant.
>
> Well, for sure, but
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/libc/libccrtp/1.0.2-1ubuntu1/
> tried to compile old version
> libccrtp_1.0.2-1ubuntu1_20050607-0448-i386-failed.gz 07-Jun-2005
> 04:48 2.0K
Yes, the new upload wasn't there yet, so why not try to compile the old
one? The previous builds failed - it was just trying again.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list