Ubuntu "Lite" :)
dlist at ubuntuforums.org
Mon Jul 18 20:32:01 CDT 2005
Armin Ronacher Wrote:
> Sascha Morr schrieb:
> Any gecko browsers aren't faster than firefox. There is only little
> better performance on these alternative Browsers, but not much.
> But the new Deerpark version of Firefox is much faster than in any
> > cheers
> > Sascha
> Can anyone confirm that Kazehakase and Skipstone are indeed no faster
> than Firefox? I find this hard to believe. Firefox is **dreadfully**
> slow and unresponsive on my 300MHz / 128MB computer, and my standards
> for good performance are much lower than those of most people. It
> takes almost 60 seconds to load the first time, and menus take seconds
> to appear. It frequently hangs for 10 seconds or more. It becomes
> virtually unusable when sites use complex DHTML, such as scrolling
> text. When minimized for several minutes, Linux seems to re-allocate
> the memory it was using, so that maximizing it again takes 20 seconds
> or so. I think finding a usable web browser will be the single biggest
> problem for Ubuntu Lite.
> I've also been looking at EDE for a desktop- looks very promising in
> terms of refinement and ease of use and speed. Enlightenment e17 might
> actually be an idea too if the snazzy effects are turned off. IceWM to
> me feels old and confusing, and XFCE4 is a memory pig.
> Possibly more important that the desktop is the underlying system
> config. One major advantage of Ubuntu is its HAL/DBUS
> preconfiguration. If combined with Ivman, the wonderful media
> automounting will work independantly of desktop environment, even with
> ROX or the command line. This is great for old computers that have USB
> ports but are running something like Windows NT with no USB support.
> It might also be worthwhile to include good multimedia programs- Linux
> can enable older hardware to play videos and music quite well.
> I am eagerly looking forward to this project - it is sorely needed in
> the Linux world. Not everyone lives in a developed country where RAM
> modules can be obtained for free. And not everyone in the developed
> countries wants to take the time to upgrade hardware or spend money on
> it when not really necessary. Thanks for working on this!
> P.S. Is there a mirror for ubuntulite.org until the bandwidth
> situation is fixed? Looks like I'm not the only one interested in
More information about the ubuntu-devel