Review Day on July, 28th
siretart at gmail.com
Sat Jul 16 03:18:46 CDT 2005
On 7/16/05, Loïc Minier <lool+ubuntu at via.ecp.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > I'd suggest you try to package it for yourself, and show it to some
> > MOTU who can give you comments about your packaging. If you are
> > confident with your package, put it on revu, and we will review it for
> > inclusion.
> I think it would be wrong to package gstreamer-lame as a separate
> source package since it would have the same source as gst-plugins.
> The gst-plugins source packages supports building the "lame" and
> "avifile" plugin, these are not activated in Debian because they
> wouldn't be acceptable.
Hm. there is gst-plugins only for warty available. has this been
> I've documented the files generating these bits in HACKING.Debian,
> but this is based on work by David I. Lehn.
great. so it should be possible to enable it somhow easily.
> I'm surprized that this would cause no inclusion problem in Ubuntu, I
> see that lame packages are included in multiverse, but I suppose Ubuntu
> is still responsible for them?
Yes, but please note that in universe we MUST NOT depend on anything
in multiverse. Having said this I'm not sure if a sourcepackage can
create binary packages in different sections and if this allowed at
More information about the ubuntu-devel