[Bug 5302] sysvinit: new changes from Debian require merging

[Scott James Remnant]

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:11 +0000, bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com
wrote:

> Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
> http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5302
> Ubuntu | sysvinit
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From amu at tr.debian.net  2005-01-12 13:11 UTC -------
>     No changes from 2.86-5.  Used the .ds naming convention 
>     that is suggested for packages which need to have their 
>     docs removed. 
> 
Did I miss something?  Why do packages need to have their docs removed?
I thought we were considering the GFDL "free enough"...

Actually, on that note, would it be valid for us to put back removed
GFDL documentation; for example autoconf had its purged recently (into
non-free autoconf-doc which we haven't got in our archive!)  In that
case I think we should sync it from non-free, or simply put the package
back together again.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant     Linux.Ars: Best Community, Best Distribution and
scott at ubuntu.com                   Best Newcomer 2004:  Ubuntu Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20050112/f01bb330/attachment.pgp