Accepted linux-restricted-modules-2.6.10 2.6.10-2 (source)
jhaltom at feedbackplusinc.com
Fri Jan 7 13:17:41 CST 2005
Are there any documents anywhere explaining why the modules were moved
into this linux-restricted-modules package vs how Debian had them, in
separate packages. (with a linux-restricted meta package maybe?)
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:21 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:06:25PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > * The fact that 2.6.10-1 is meaningless -- it doesn't tell you
> > whether you have 1.0.6111 or 1.0.6629 of nvidia, or whether
> > you have 3.14.6 or 8.8.25 of fglrx.
> We could still autogenerate the version number even if it isn't the same
> as the version in the changelog, couldn't we?
> Colin Watson [cjwatson at canonical.com]
Jerry Haltom <wasabi at larvalstage.net>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
More information about the ubuntu-devel