Spatial mess prevention
Jonas Jørgensen
jonas at decicode.com
Sun Apr 3 09:36:25 CDT 2005
Pardon me for jumping into the discussion as an outsider with a bunch of
quotes from official documents, but it seems to me that the way this
change was made violates some of Ubuntu's policies and procedures:
1) According to the release schedule[1], Hoary is currently in Final
Freeze, which is described[2] as an "EXTREMELY anal-retentive,
high-caution period", where only critical bugs and exceptional
circumstances patches can go in. This change hardly qualifies as one of
those.
2) From the Ubuntu Code of Conduct[2]: "Be considerate. [...] For
example, when we are in a feature freeze, please don't upload
dramatically new versions of critical system software". We are in a
feature freeze, and while this is not a dramatically new version, it is
a highly significant change.
3) I understand that this change was made upon the sabdfl's request. The
Governance document[3] describes the role of the sabdfl as one who makes
the necessary difficult decisions when no consensus can be reached by
the community; not as one who orders changes in UI behavior a week
before release time without any public debate beforehand. The same
document notes that "It is understood that the divisive use of the
SABDFL's authority could weaken the project. For that reason the
authority is used carefully". It appears that those lines were forgotten
when this decision was made.
I join others in thread in asking the developers to consider reverting
this change for now and deferring the decision to Breezy.
[1] http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/HoaryReleaseSchedule
[2] http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/FinalFreeze
[3] https://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/conduct/document_view
[4] https://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/processes/governance
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list