emacs in default selection ?

[Colin Watson]

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:27:07PM -0300, Fábio Mendes wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:35 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:41:03PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > I'd rather we just picked one vi implementation across the whole
> > > distribution; vim is the best, thus should be the vi we include.
> > 
> > Fortunately, this is what we've done. :-)
> 
> Why two console editors? Why not just link vi to nano?

Owwwwwwwwwwww! My head would EXPLODE. People who type 'vi' know what
they want.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                    [cjwatson at canonical.com]