emacs in default selection ?

[Fábio Mendes]

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:35 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:41:03PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> 
> > I'd rather we just picked one vi implementation across the whole
> > distribution; vim is the best, thus should be the vi we include.
> 
> Fortunately, this is what we've done. :-)
> 
> -- 
>  - mdz
> 
Why two console editors? Why not just link vi to nano? It's as simple as
a  ln -s /etc/alternatives/editor /usr/bin/nan. I think this is the best
option, but I'm biased though I can't stand vim. Personaly I use mcedit.
It has nice features like syntax highlight yet is very intuitive to use.

-Fabio