Idea for expanded support of some non-free software
jeff.waugh at canonical.com
Mon Nov 29 23:58:36 CST 2004
<quote who="Philippe Landau">
> >Absolutely. The small team of Ubuntu developers within Canonical
> may i ask you how many you are ?
Canonical has around 40 employees, around half of which work directly on the
> >have a very clear brief: To provide a totally awesome Free Software
> >operating system. So supporting proprietary software is outside that
> >brief, and in some cases, not possible at all (ie. we can't fix problems
> >with it,
> this is a common situation, and you work around it daily by integrating
> software including it's bugs so it is still usable. of course it is
> important to have priorities and time budgets. is it possible to make
> these transparent ?
All development is done on the public mailing lists and irc channels.
> >I don't think this is a relevant point - you seem to be
> >suggesting that we should set Ubuntu apart by including
> >proprietary software. That is not in line with our philosophy.
> i am not suggesting this, no.
> my question is genuine.
> since reading about ubuntu on distrowatch,
> i always wondered what the main goals of this distro are.
> the publicity suggested it is making
> an easily usable OS for the simple user,
> what i saw pointed more to complete debian's ambition,
> there were scant hints the goal would be future profitability,
> and there was the crucial promise to keep it
> free of charge, including support.
> it would be great if the real priorities and aims were published.
Our priorities and aims are published on the website and reiterated in these
threads on the development list.
Ubuntu in Mataró, Spain: December 5th-18th http://www.ubuntulinux.org/
"Trying to get a PC to analyse one of the most abstract forms of
language - the poem - is like trying to drill for oil with a banana."
- The Register
More information about the ubuntu-devel