equivalent of chkconfig

Tom H tomh0665 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 18 09:52:20 UTC 2015

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:32:42 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> unfounded FUD
> What next?
> Actually everything I pointed out is correct, it's not unfounded FUD.
> Even you mentioned that not all services are ported over.
> It's not that hard for me to make a profound comparison between an Arch
> Linux install, that finished the transition 3 years ago and follows
> systemd from upstream and an Ubuntu Wily install, since they are running
> on the same machine and I'm using an upstream systemd with all services
> ported.
> You actually don't know what you are talking about, if you call Ubuntus
> systemd implementation transparent. It's a mess, the transition is
> _not_ finished, init related files are spread over different locations.

You might have a point if systemd upstream didn't provide
systemd-sysv-generator and systemd-sysv-install.

Ubuntu and Debian are simply using upstream tools that allow for
hybrid init systems.

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list