Puppet version bump

John Moser john.r.moser at gmail.com
Wed Feb 6 00:50:52 UTC 2013

On 02/05/2013 07:45 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> John Moser <john.r.moser <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> 2.  Convince Ubuntu to put the newest Puppetmaster in Backports.  I am
>> not advocating this either.
> Slightly off-topic, but FWIW I would be happy to see raring's puppet
> (whatever version that ends up being) in precise-backports.
> lucid-backports has puppet 2.7 and that made my life a LOT easier since
> my puppetmaster runs precise and I am using some recent modules. Having
> backports available but not installed by default is really quite nice.
> Furthermore it's quite likely that at some point I'll have some clients
> running a newer Ubuntu than the puppetmaster, and it would be great to
> be able to support it just by upgrading puppetmaster to a backports
> version.


While we're at it, why is etckeeper stuff in the package?  The 
Puppetlabs guys said because it's in Debian's package and "Debian 
packagers are fruitbats", so they're imitating "for compatibility."

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list