Freeze exception for including usb-modeswitch in main and default (was Re: Including usb-modeswitch in default installation?)
Marjo Mercado
marjo.mercado at canonical.com
Mon Mar 1 14:03:20 UTC 2010
Hi Scott,
I agree with your proposal below. It's quite late in the release cycle
for such a major change with potential of breakage.
Thanks,
Marjo
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:49 +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 12:17 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
>
> > A little bit *bump* - so, what we do with this one? Is there enough
> > reason for freeze exception for this one?
> >
> A freeze exception wouldn't just be "add usb-modeswitch", we also need
> to remove modem-modeswitch from udev, make sure that usb-modeswitch
> covers all of its hardware - and probably also do the same with the
> kernel code that deals with the other kinds of devices.
>
> It's quite a large change to make this late in an LTS cycle, with a
> possible impact of breaking these devices entirely.
>
> I'd be more comfortable with going with what we have for now - and
> having the work done to use only usb-modeswitch in lucid+1
>
> Scott
--
Marjo F. Mercado
Ubuntu QA Team Manager
W: (917) 338-6551
IRC: marjo
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list