Thoughts on quitting and window controls
Derek Broughton
derek at pointerstop.ca
Thu Apr 8 16:44:50 UTC 2010
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> Maybe. But the paradigm isn't really that pressing the Close
> button minimizes the window to the systray.
I beg to differ. Think as a user, not a developer. I submit that _users_
do not generally understand a difference between minimizing to the tray or
the task bar - except that they know something minimized to the task bar is
taking up more space.
> The paradigm is that closing a
> window closes that window *and* that closing a window never closes a
> service.
Again, I disagree. Users think "close" and don't stop to think...
> I think most people would be confused if e.g. clicking close on
> the main sound preferences dialog stopped the sound server.
...what closing a sound server means. I think most people are confused by
_any_ change to their system. [I'm confused by the fact that Firefox now
has the ability to hang my entire machine, which it only started to do with
the last upgrade] Yes, making the close button shut down a server and the
minimize button minimize to either the task bar or the system tray _would_
be initially confusing but imo is more logical, and would be more intuitive.
> Arguably, the
> fact that you can get the window back via the systray doesn't mean that
> the *window* has been minimized to the systray any more than saying that
> we "minimize" a document window to the "My Documents" folder.
Certainly it doesn't - but it means nothing to the user that the window was
actually destroyed rather than minimized.
>
> I think nobody expects the "X" button to close services that were started
> on start-up.
I think you're wrong. I think the typical user is surprised to find that
those things are still running after he's "closed" them. Unfortunately,
what you and I _think_ is pretty much irrelevant, since nobody has ever made
much attempt to figure out what our _users_ think.
--
derek
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list