Any news on skype+pulseaudio+intel_hda_realtek ?
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Tue Feb 10 18:06:00 UTC 2009
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:35:50 +0000 Scott James Remnant
<scott at canonical.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:31 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> Undoubtly, efforts to avoid regressions are a very good thing. One
>> possible solution is to offer the possibility to roll back to or keep
>> the previous technology. Perhaps you want to have a look at other
>> distros to get an idea on how they deal with this challenge:
>As far as I'm aware, there aren't any distributions doing 6-monthly
>releases that deal with this challenge.
>Those that do use longer release cycles, with more time for testing and
>(Indeed, the most obvious other distribution that performs a 6-monthly
>release - Fedora - is arguably even more bleeding edge and less
>conservative than we are!)
True, but Fedora is meant to be a bleeding edge distro that feeds into Red Hat's actual
product. For Ubuntu (at least historically) each relaease IS the product.
It sounds like we are evolving to a model of three Fedora releases followed by a RHEL release.
If that's the case, I guess it just needs to be more clearly communicated.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss