Staging area for hardy-proposed ?

[(=?utf-8?q?=60=60-=5F-=C2=B4=C2=B4?=) -- Fernando]

Olá Scott e a todos.

On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:43:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Unless one knows that one is testing a particular package, what fix to verify,  and to be on the lookout for regressions in that package
> 
> In general, I think testers should test (and really need to be aware of what 
> they are testing) and users should use the output of the test process (i.e. -updates in this case).
> 
> Scott K

+1

-- 
BUGabundo  :o)
(``-_-´´)	http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080605/e2c2f139/attachment.sig>