Open Movie Editor vs. Kdenlive.

Cory K. coryisatm at nc.rr.com
Wed Jan 23 16:29:23 UTC 2008


George Farris wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 13:52 -0500, Cory K. wrote:
>   
>> Ok. We need a serious technical look at these two to replace PiTiVi in
>> Ubuntu Studio-Hardy.
>>
>> Open Movie Editor - http://openmovieeditor.sourceforge.net
>>
>> KDEnlive - http://www.kdenlive.org
>>
>> I'd also like to reference -
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/consortium/2008-January/001842.html
>> as having some good points. ie: OME has JACK support.
>>
>> -Cory \m/
>>     
>
> I am trying to whip up some support and developers for the Pitivi
> project.  I think it has great potential and would hate to see it die.
>
> I know this isn't the best list but anyone who has any interest in
> Python and video editors please head over to the pitivi mailing list and
> join the discussion.
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
>
> Pitivi home page.
> http://www.pitivi.org/wiki/Main_Page
>
> Help us make this a great video editor and also advance the Gstreamer
> libraries.  It can only be a win, win situation.
>
> Thanks

Cool. I think for the normal user PiTiVi can be a great editor. For the
people looking a professional editor it's been pointed out that from a
technical POV gst just isn't where it needs to be.

Openlibs (http://www.openlibraries.org) has been said to be a better
choice for use in pro-focused apps. Which is what Ubuntu Studio and this
thread is getting at.

-Cory \m/




More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list