gThumb
David A. Harding
dave at dtrt.org
Wed Jan 16 23:28:33 UTC 2008
On Tue Jan 15 15:41:30 2008, Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:38 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
| | I outlined in my specification[1] how gThumb is more [memory]
| | efficent and takes up less [disk or CDROM] space.
| |
| | [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default
|
| We feel the opposite, that f-spot has a better user experience.
I agree with Mr. Remnant: F-Spot is beautiful and simple like, for
example, Microsoft Vista. But I don't think a pretty face should
distract us from considering Mr. Quigley's points: F-Spot is inefficent
and may violate Microsoft's patents.
Ubuntu users deserve beautiful things and they don't deserve to have
them taken away because we ignored potential patent violations.
Thanks,
-Dave
--
David A. Harding Website: http://dtrt.org/
Email: dave at dtrt.org
Jabber/XMPP: dharding at jabber.org
Calendar: http://dtrt.org/calendar/
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list