gThumb
Jean Levasseur
levasseur.jean at videotron.ca
Wed Jan 16 03:09:14 UTC 2008
Perhaps, there is Digikam which is really neat, but it's KDE based, so I
would still stick with f-spot as default. After getting a little love
from devs (that are already doing an awesome job) f-spot will rock!
Le mardi 15 janvier 2008 à 14:10 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan a écrit :
> Blue Marine is one program I've seen recommended for proper handling
> of EXIF data (that's the metadata I was trying to remember). I was
> looking for an alternative to F-Spot because of the poor EXIF-handling
> at the time.
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 1:56 PM, Kevin Fries <kfries at cctus.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:34 +0100, Milan wrote:
> > Kevin Fries wrote:
> > > This argument has raged before. Has anyone thought of
> maybe a
> > > compromise... Something much better than GThumb (not hard)
> but not based
> > > on Mono. Maybe something like Blue Marine?
> > >
> > > http://bluemarine.tidalwave.it/
> > >
> > > Just a thought. They already package a DEB file and it is
> about 30M,
> > > not sure how big the other packages are.
> > >
> > >
> > Is Java really better than Mono? Not speaking of needs to
> stabilize this
> > development version...
>
>
> I personally don't have a problem with Mono or Java. Both are
> excellent
> technologies in my book. Each has advantages and
> disadvantages like any
> technology. But when I last defended Mono and F-Spot, I got
> jumped like
> a gang member in the wrong neighborhood.
>
> Just trying to show options here. Looking for solutions to
> defuse the
> argument that erupted last time this was brought up, before
> the argument
> erupts again. Hoping to show that while gThumb is a poor
> product on its
> best days (editorial, I know, but face it, its not good), but
> F-Spot and
> Mono are not our only solutions. There are other programs out
> there
> that are of some serious quality.
>
> The BM page says that the product is not quite of release
> quality, but
> lets be real, its not of a professional release quality. For
> the
> average consumer, its perfectly stable enough. I would not
> want to rely
> on this if I was a professional photographer until a few bugs
> were
> worked out. But this product has no more bugs than the
> average FOSS
> product.
>
> BTW, I have just briefly played with Blue Marine, and that is
> one hell
> of a program. The type that really takes a run away from the
> second
> rate Windows based graphical tools, and right at the far
> superior Mac
> based one. It would definitely be a capabilities upgrade from
> anything
> in the repos now. If nothing else, putting that in Multiverse
> would not
> be the dumbest idea I heard.
>
> --
> Kevin Fries
> Senior Linux Engineer
> Computer and Communications Technology, Inc
> A Division of Japan Communications Inc.
>
> --
>
>
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mackenzie Morgan
> Linux User #432169
> ACM Member #3445683
> http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
> apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080115/18f176e9/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list