Strawman: Change the Ubuntu Release Cycle
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Sat Jan 5 20:28:36 UTC 2008
On Saturday 05 January 2008 15:24, Evan wrote:
> There have been a lot of ideas tossed around on this thread, but the
> general consensus seems to be that non-LTS releases (Gutsy in particular)
> are somewhat unstable. Backports used with LTS releases are useful, but
> (correct me if I'm wrong here) they don't provide new features such as
> compiz-fusion or tracker, they only upgrade currently installed packages.
New packages can be (and routinely are) backported. The trick can be if they
require newer versions of existing libraries. Then it may not be feasible.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss