Backtracing, Invalidated Bugs and Quality

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wednesday 20 August 2008 10:31, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Paul Smith wrote on 20/08/08 15:20:
> >...
> > On the other hand I do think it's worthwhile to somehow mark bugs which
> > are not sufficiently documented as to be reproducible/fixable.
> >...
> > So, if there is no suitable bug state existing already we need a new
> > state for these kinds of bugs.  We can call it "watching", or
> > "insufficient information", or "can not reproduce", or whatever.
>
> That state already exists: it's called "Incomplete".
>
Right, but given the current plans for auto expiration, at some point the 
difference between Incomplete and Invalid will be only a certain number of 
days, so in the end it amounts to the same thing.

Scott K