The Harvest Season has started!

[Daniel Holbach]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for your suggestions,

Brett Alton schrieb:
> 1) The user can not sort data in a way he chooses, it is rather hard-programmed

Please file a bug about it at https://launchpad.net/harvest/+filebug and
please elaborate a bit on how you'd like the sorting to work.


> 2) The user can not modify the points system, which doesn't need to be
> a must, but the point system should seperate more, shouldn't it?

What do you mean when you say "[it] should separate more"? Do you feel
the values in the scoring should be different? I'd much prefer if we had
a sane set of defaults instead of calculating different scores for
everybody.

You can also file a bug at https://launchpad.net/harvest-data/+filebug
about it.


> Having critical bugs set at 5 point, wishlist set at 1, etc. Right
> now, there seems to be only a couple categories (-500,-200,0,etc.)

I personally find that these categories are not very telling.
High-target packages like linux or ubiquity will draw a lot of
attention. More telling than that are probably things like "50% of bugs
forwarded upstream", etc.

We could discuss it on the bugsquad list to find out how to create the
best possible metrics.


> 3) The user can not search for specific packages (all of them that
> start with 'A', all of them that have at least one critical bug, etc.)

Can you follow up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/harvest/+bug/247645 with
your ideas?


> I think it is great start, but more needs to be added to make it truly useful.

Thanks for the flowers. I know that there's a lot more potential in
harvest and advice like yours (and patches!!!) are truly helpful.

Have a nice day,
 Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlsi6RjrlnQWd1esRAgc1AJ0eseJZyRsem0rAyokfustz5b8o2QCfQe1z
MQMB9Eigg4REJdDcoPqmj58=
=NP+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----