regular fsck runs are too disturbing
Caroline Ford
caroline.ford.work at googlemail.com
Thu Sep 27 22:40:05 UTC 2007
We are strongly being advised NOT to leave things on standby here as
it's bad for the environment.
Caroline
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 23:46 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 27.09.2007 um 22:17 schrieb Phillip Susi:
>
> > Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> ReiserFS is effectively unmaintained. I've switched from ReiserFS
> >> to Ext3 for
> >> my installs too. While it works well now, bitrot seems inevitable.
> >>
> >> Scott K
> >>
> >> Note: This has nothing to do with an legal issues the developers
> >> have. The
> >> Reiser devs have been focused on ResierFS4 for quite some time.
> >
> > The point though, is still valid; reiserfs doesn't bother forcing a
> > disk
> > check every n mounts, so why does ext3 still do this?
>
> Not an answer, but I feel people should stop thinking about doing
> anything essential at boot/shutdown time. Right now, many people
> switch their computers on and off regularly, but the days of such
> habits are counted.
>
> Think about Laptops and PCs with a reliable standby mode. Think about
> PDAs, Phones, TV boxes. When not used, they go into standby mode.
> Some of them don't even feature something like "off". They all get
> booted once or twice a year, so the point in time "before mounting"
> next to never happens. If you want to do maintenance, you have to do
> it on the running system.
>
>
> Markus,
> writing from a laptop with about 2 months uptime.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
> http://www.jump-ing.de/
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list