regular fsck runs are too disturbing
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Thu Sep 27 20:37:37 UTC 2007
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:17:43 -0400 Phillip Susi <psusi at cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> ReiserFS is effectively unmaintained. I've switched from ReiserFS to
>> my installs too. While it works well now, bitrot seems inevitable.
>> Scott K
>> Note: This has nothing to do with an legal issues the developers have.
>> Reiser devs have been focused on ResierFS4 for quite some time.
>The point though, is still valid; reiserfs doesn't bother forcing a disk
>check every n mounts, so why does ext3 still do this? I think these
>days the kernel is bug free enough and hardware is generally reliable
>enough that we can drop the forced fsck by default.
Dunno. I was just answering your "Why not ReiserFS?" question.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss