regular fsck runs are too disturbing
psusi at cfl.rr.com
Thu Sep 27 20:17:43 UTC 2007
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> ReiserFS is effectively unmaintained. I've switched from ReiserFS to Ext3 for
> my installs too. While it works well now, bitrot seems inevitable.
> Scott K
> Note: This has nothing to do with an legal issues the developers have. The
> Reiser devs have been focused on ResierFS4 for quite some time.
The point though, is still valid; reiserfs doesn't bother forcing a disk
check every n mounts, so why does ext3 still do this? I think these
days the kernel is bug free enough and hardware is generally reliable
enough that we can drop the forced fsck by default.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss