regular fsck runs are too disturbing
erik.andren at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 07:54:54 UTC 2007
2007/9/27, Waldemar Kornewald <wkornew at freenet.de>:
> Are there any alternatives? Here are two examples:
> Use SMART (AFAIK, Vista does that).
SMART is hardware- and not filesystem dependent.
Besides, the implementation of SMART differs wildly from each hard-drive
Run fsck read-only (even on mounted partitions) as a low-priority
> process in the background when the system is *idle* and report to the
> user only when an error is found, then requiring a reboot and full
> system check on boot-up.
> Waldemar Kornewald
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss