fsck on boot is major usability issue
Francesco Fumanti
francesco.fumanti at gmx.net
Mon Dec 31 12:32:34 UTC 2007
At 12:15 PM -0500 12/26/07, Phillip Susi wrote:
>Chris Martin wrote:
>> I have been following this and I thought I would add my 2 cents worth
>> (1) At shutdown is good
>> (2) Timeout/interuptable is good
>> (3) BUT. The default action should be ³No Action²
>>
>> At shutdown the user is prompted that a file system check is required
>>
>> When the timeout occurs (it should be short say 30 seconds) the
>> default should be to skip it until the next shutdown
>>
>> IE the user has to explicitly select that now is a good time to do the
>> fsck.
>
>I agree completely. The system should just tell the user that running a
>check periodically is a good idea, but let them decide if now is a good
>time. The default action should be to skip the check for now, and
>prompt again at the next boot. Other options should be to remind me
>again in 5 boots/next week.
From my point of view, I would also appreciate if
the system would tell me at shutdown that a fsck
will occur at the next boot giving the user at
least these possibilities (other people might
want more possibilities):
- perform it right away and automatically shutdown when complete
- tell it to not run the fsck immediately nor at
the next boot (with reminders later)
- for people with several disks: when a fsck is
needed for a disk, add the option to run the fsck
on all the disks, even if it is not needed yet;
this would minimize how often the user will be
prompted for a fsck, as all the disks would be
checked simultaneously.
Francesco
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list