Make Ubuntu usable when 'universe' is disabled
Ma Xiaojun
damage3025 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 17:25:18 UTC 2013
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> packages always enter the archive through universe and only later get
> MIR processing, both will be in main by release.
So I don't need to file MIR bugs for packages I mentioned as you are
aware of this?
> main refers to packages that get constant support libnspr4-0d simply
> doesnt get this.
Shouldn't it get support?
> nothing is non free in the dependencies you pointed out in our IRC
> discussion (as adam and I explained to you on IRC as well ...).
> each of them can be installed standalone (and will be pffered for
> install by totem once a matching mime type is found), all of them have
> free licenses and are opensource, they do not qualify for multiverse (i
> also fail to see how that helps to "make ubuntu usable when universe is
> disabled")
As I checked, Debian also put *-ugly into main; same as your practise.
For, "make ubuntu usable when universe is disabled", I think *-ugly
and others may be essential part of desktop experience; the OS should
able to play media files using popular codec.
The reason I try Ubuntu with universe disabled is that universe is not
a effective way of getting quality software. Packages are generally
outdated and may contain unwanted changes.
I'm interested in:
1. Is it possible to use an alternative package manager like Homebrew
[1] on Mac OS X
2. Is it possible to use bundled GUI apps without worrying about
dependency issues.
1. http://brew.sh/
More information about the ubuntu-desktop
mailing list