Default Browser Follow-up

[Timo Jyrinki]

I think additionally Chromium used to have better multi-tab
performance for a long time. Ie. Firefox users got used to action
stopping when some heavy javascript was running in some other tab. But
Firefox 22/23 have surprisingly well now improved on that front. I've
been using Firefox all the time, since Firefox Sync is the killer
feature for me as it's provenly client side encrypted.

I'll continue using Firefox even if the switch happens, but I don't
have anything against the default switch either. Both browsers are
very good.

-Timo

2013/8/14 Petko Ditchev <pditchev at gmail.com>:
> From what I've read: The majority of Ubuntu users like Firefox , but
> Chromium is better from a developer (Ubuntu-developer) standpoint because of
> WebKit , and is no less feature-rich or user-friendly. Firefox will remain
> until Chromium gets better support on the Ubuntu side , and until the people
> defending Firefox tire and come to terms with the decision. Am I missing
> something ? (everything's pretty reasonable , since FF isn't going away from
> the repos)
>
> Petko
>
>
> On 13.08.2013 20:19, Rick Spencer wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Benjamin Kerensa <bkerensa at ubuntu.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jason Warner
>>> <jason.warner at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All -
>>>>
>>>> Here's the latest follow-up on the default browser for 13.10 discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Some great points were raised about the historic pattern of updates
>>>> around
>>>> Chromium.
>>>>
>>>> First, to get the formalities out the way, Firefox remains the default
>>>> for
>>>> 13.10.
>>>>
>>>> Second, I'd like to talk about the Chromium issues raised. It was
>>>> rightly
>>>> pointed out that there have been issues keeping up with Chromium
>>>> changes.
>>>> The big issue was with Web Apps integration and some changing APIs.
>>>> Since
>>>> we've introduced Web Apps changes like this have always caused us some
>>>> grief. Web Apps have always been an interim step until we were able to
>>>> get a
>>>> more self contained web apps container. That work is planned for 13.10
>>>> and
>>>> progressing well[1]. This should be done for 13.10 and very much refined
>>>> for
>>>> 14.04.
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, I do want to consider Chromium by default for 14.04 once the
>>>> above
>>>> is no longer an issue. I sincerely believe Chromium is the better
>>>> experience
>>>> for general users and should be strongly considered for our next LTS.
>>>
>>> You have not provided any criteria as to why Chromium would provide a
>>> better experience for general users. I think its important to note
>>> that so far there has been more opposition by developers and users to
>>> making Chromium the default.
>>
>> Have these reasons not been discussed ad naseum? I think most
>> developers probably consider this a relatively minor decision that
>> Jason and the desktop team are well position to make. I don't believe
>> there will be any 100% consensus on this issue, and it's clear that
>> Jason has been very active in soliciting and considering input and
>> different points of view. At the end of the day, someone needs to make
>> a decision, and in Ubuntu, we must entrust the people doing the work
>> to make decisions.
>>
>>> Without out any evidence of a greater experience I think it would be a
>>> poor decision to flip default on millions of users.
>>
>> " Greater experience" is subjective so I don't think there will be a
>> lot of "evidence" that can't be counter pointed on either side.
>>
>> I get that some people are passionate about Firefox. Some people are
>> passionate about Chromium. There were folks passionate about Banshee
>> and folks passionate about Rhythmbox. There were folks passionate
>> about Pdigin, and folks passionate about Empathy. The beauty of Ubuntu
>> is that a decision can be made about a default around which we can
>> rally for consistency and integration and low complexity for users,
>> but the default in no way limits anyone's freedom or their ability to
>> contribute to those projects that they care about. Deciding that
>> Chromium is the better browser for the default in Ubuntu is not saying
>> Firefox is a bad browser, or even that Firefox is not better for some
>> people in some situations.
>>
>>> If you could provide some solid technical justifications that motivate
>>> this discussion having been started it might be helpful in understand
>>> why such a change is proposed. If there is something lacking in
>>> Firefox then perhaps a dialogue can be started upstream and I would be
>>> happy to help guide such a discussion.
>>
>> I find that these kind of discussions are rarely effective and can
>> easily cause hard feelings. The problem when choosing between 2
>> similar pieces of upstream software is that it is rarely the case that
>> one of them stands still. So we've had situations where an upstream
>> implements requirements so that they can be default, but the
>> "competing" upstream meanwhile enhanced their product and so remained
>> the better choice. The first upstream then felt burned because playing
>> "catch up" did not work. So, when considering requirements, in my
>> epxerience it's generally better not to go down this road and rather
>> judge the products based on their current implementations, their
>> support models, and their road maps.
>>
>> In terms of "why is the discussion started" we must acknowledge that
>> Chromium is a very popular browser, works very well, but did not exist
>> all those years ago when Firefox was included as default in Ubuntu.
>> The desktop team wouldn't be doing their job if they weren't asking
>> these questions.
>>
>> Cheers, Rick
>>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-desktop mailing list
> ubuntu-desktop at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop