[Desktop13.04-Topic] Reduce patch burden
Iain Lane
laney at ubuntu.com
Tue Oct 16 11:13:02 UTC 2012
Hi,
A lot of our packages are patched over upstream. Each of these comes
with a maintenance cost and is also a source of bugs and frustration
(quilt patches aren't the easiest things in the world to work with).
I think we should systematically look at our patches and re-evaluate for
each one
- Whether it is really (still) necessary — if not, drop
- If we can forward upstream if not already or if we can help
its upstream inclusion along
- Who is going to maintain the patch in the distro if it needs to be
kept as a local patch — desktop, PS, …
It would be good if we could use something like DEP5 headers for all
patches, including adding them to existing patches. It's sometimes
really quite difficult to figure out what a particular patch is for,
whether it is upstream and so on.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ iain at orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ laney at debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ laney at ubuntu.com ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/attachments/20121016/f31ab8cc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-desktop
mailing list