Desktop team weekly report -- 2009-09-22

[Bryce Harrington]

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:55:13PM -0700, Jono Bacon wrote:
> On 10/03/2009 11:39 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >You know, in these cases the current +filebug is destroying information
> >we need.  If the bug reporter already knows at time of filing that it is
> >a 'translation', 'wishlist', 'usability', 'packaging', etc. issue, then
> >this is extremely valuable information as to how to handle the bug.
> >
> >There are specific teams with interest in each of these classes of bugs,
> >who do not regularly troll through individual packages bug listings but
> >who might be able to handle these issues directly if they were tagged as
> >such.
> >
> >Currently, this info is not captured at time of bug filing, so someone
> >else has to think and tag it later.  This adds unnecessary delay and
> >increases the workload on the triager.
> >
> This sounds like great feedback, Bryce. What do you feel is the best
> solution?

I'm imagining a set of radio buttons on the +filebug page, which apply
the given tag to the bug on submit.

I'm sure there's more than one way to do it though.

Bryce