Dialogue and moving forward

[Benjamin Kerensa]

I disagree I think the statements impact both the UCC and KC's individual
members reputations too. You have folks in the Ubuntu project who are upset
by the KC's action and you have folks in Kubuntu and upstream upset with
the UCC.

Removing it would not be transparent or good governance practice at all...
Plus
it is on archive.org and paraphrased on news articles so what is the point
even?

Why not work on solving the disagreement so you could instead provide
updated
statements reflecting how you solved this using good leadership best
practice?





On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Michael Hall <mhall119 at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 06/17/2015 09:19 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > I think trying to remove either would not be in the best interest
> >
> > of KC or UCC. One piece of advice Jono once gave me was
> >
> > not to delete blog posts but to take responsibility for them.
> >
>
> Jono's advice pertained to removing your own posts to protect yours, and
> in those cases it is very good advice. However, that isn't the case
> here, where the party being harmed isn't the one who posted it.
>
> Michael Hall
> mhall119 at ubuntu.com
>



-- 
*Benjamin Kerensa*
*http://benjaminkerensa.com <http://benjaminkerensa.com>*
*"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-community-team/attachments/20150617/e14ce9a4/attachment.html>