[U-co] Canonical definitivamente no escucha al usuario!!

[Jhon Mandrake]

http://blog.uptodown.com/wp-content/uploads/Comparativa-ubuntu.jpg

http://openbenchmarking.org/embed.php?i=1210191-RA-AMDRADEON00&sha=be1bd06&p=2

http://openbenchmarking.org/embed.php?i=1210191-RA-AMDRADEON00&sha=eb771ae&p=2

http://openbenchmarking.org/embed.php?i=1210191-RA-AMDRADEON00&sha=fe4c738&p=2

http://openbenchmarking.org/embed.php?i=1210191-RA-AMDRADEON00&sha=1b9278c&p=2

*Triste pero cierto inclusive Aero o la monotona aqua son mas rapidas,la 
pregunta es pero por que seguir  tratando de imponer algo que simplemente 
no "pega"? 
*
*ahora*:

*Most User Friendly:*
*Here we enter completely subjective terrority. For most user-friendly 
among the better-known distros, I nominate Mint.*
*
*
*Mint is based on Ubuntu, so it starts with Ubuntu's advantages: huge 
software repositories, a familiar system, a big user community, etc. Mint 
enhances the user experience by addressing Ubuntu's shortcomings. It 
includes all the proprietary software and codecs required for typical tasks 
so you get a ready-to-use system right out of the box. *
*
*
*The Mint team foresaw the controversy Canonical would uncork with its 
switch to the Unity interface. Mint protected their users by offering Mate 
and Cinnamon. The former is a continuation fork of the GNOME 2 interface. 
The latter takes GNOME 3 and enhances it with traditional features like a 
bottom panel. While Canonical veers off on their Unity tangent -- telling 
the user community what they should want -- Mint quietly satisfies them by 
continuing with desktop-friendly UI's.*
*
*
*Many other distros could be cited as most user-friendly. Mint's philosophy 
of capitalizing on Ubuntu while addressing its shortcomings is a winner.*

*también perdiendo en el campo del usuario final?*

*Most Stable Across Releases:**
**As an IT support tech, I supported two small organizations that 
standardized on Ubuntu years ago. They chose Ubuntu due to its wide 
popularity and user-friendly reputation. Now both groups are unhappy. 
Canonical has not protected their user community from the disruptive 
changes they introduce. The radically different Unity interface was the 
last straw. These organizations want a distro that introduces well-tested 
improvements -- smoothly and incrementally. **
**Several distros meet this need. Two that I've used are OpenSUSE and 
VectorLinux. Perhaps the best choices are Red Hat and CentOS. As a 
commercial server, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is intended for production IT. 
Stability and measured change are its watchwords. CentOS is a free distro 
based on RHEL. It is 100% compatible rebuild for people who want operating 
system stability without the cost of a support contract.*
y asi hay post y blogs que abundan en la red comentando sino cosa 
similares,analisis que no dejan muy bien parado al Quetzal.

no se  gente que esta pasando y me alerta bastante por que es un buen SO,lo 
triste es que una organización pierda los estribos y no entienda de razones 
solo se entienda el mismo,no lo digo solo yo lo dicen los que saben y 
los números. Aun falta mirar cosillas como test al kernel haber quien esta 
administrando mejor tu dinero en hardware en fin.

*!!!no se pierde la esperanza ni la objetividad!!!!*

*JE NE SUIS PAS DOGMATIQUE, LES DOGMES SE RESTREINDRE ET LIMITER, AU LIEU 
DE SOUTENIR LES CAUSES DE LA QUALITÉ TOUT EN GARDANT*