Re-imagining

[Darcy Casselman]

I'm not arguing for "centralization of control."  Who has time for
control?

Like I've said, I'm all for city teams being more formally established as a
thing and more formally recognized by the LoCo council (my take on the
Moscow ridiculousness is here:
http://ubuntu.5.x6.nabble.com/Re-Ubuntu-Moscow-LoCo-tp5019872p5020043.html).


I see the broader LoCo team, whatever its boundaries, as being a
communication and collaboration mechanism.  (That and I like the Ubuntu
Canada logo better than anything I could come up with for Ubuntu Waterloo,
so I'd probably prefer to make stickers of that to put on my laptop).

Darcy.


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Kip Warner <kip at thevertigo.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:56 -0400, Darcy Casselman wrote:
> > It is arbitrary.  The goal, I think, is to subdivide the world into large
> > areas that catch everybody.  Limiting to *only* cities wouldn't catch
> > everybody and in all but a few cases wouldn't, again, have the traffic to
> > justify the *online* community.
>
> It would be better to allow them to form organically at whatever size
> and over whatever locality they choose to. If there is a desire to
> create both an Ubuntu Russia LoCo as well as an Ubuntu Moscow LoCo, so
> be it. It should be overly clear to all of us of an internet generation
> the fallacy of over reliance on centralization of control.
>
> --
> Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
> OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
> http://www.thevertigo.com
>
> --
> ubuntu-ca mailing list
> ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-ca/attachments/20130410/d3c82dfa/attachment.html>