List admin

[Darryl Moore]

That's interesting, Daniel's name did not show up in the CC field. Did
you receive one or two copies of this Daniel? Looks like thereis already
some mangling going on here. :-)

On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 12:55 -0400, Darryl Moore wrote:
> OK, I've reconsiddered.......
> 
> I still think we should do it. 
> 
> Why? Well I just hit "reply all" as the argument in this link suggests,
> and as a result Daniel is going to get two copies of my reply. :-)
> 
> Sorry Daniel.
> 
> I tend to hit reply by default, mostly because other lists I'm on
> already work this way. As a result, I think the chances of my posts only
> going to the author will always be much higher then an intended private
> post going to the list. My experience with lists is that is it very rare
> that conversations go private. but it is not a big deal if you want to,
> simply change the to field in your email client.
> 
> putting the "reply to" field in does not prevent a private conversation,
> but it does encourage a public one. Isn't that what lists are all about?
> 
> just my $0.02
> 
> cheers,
> darryl
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 12:07 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > Daniel Robitaille wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> > >
> > > Both Corey and me are list admin and can make this change.  Anyone
> > > else for or against this change?
> > 
> >    I was once all for the reply-to munging, untill we got into a deeper 
> > discussion
> > about it... please, anyone who thinks that MLs should do that to your 
> > emails,
> > please read this:
> >    http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > 
> > And maybe reconsider :)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >                                       -Tristan
> > 
> > 
> 
>