[Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement
Alberto Salvia Novella
es20490446e at gmail.com
Fri Feb 14 09:39:06 UTC 2014
🌊 *Ubuntu is not a wave, but a sea*
I *think* what I'm going to say is anti-maketing, but also what for me
seems real:
Ubuntu is *not a distro* at this time, but a prototype of software
development.
The same as GNOME 3 has been in its early days, which I hated so much
and now I like so hard.
Usually I choose what *works now*, because working now is the only
warrant it's actually been well done.
On the other hand, in my opinion, no operating system is fully working
today; because "working" means "working *for nearly everyone*".
📈*Decisions work**, and rapidly*
So I chose Ubuntu because it's the only distro I see *decisions* are
taken with criteria that actually works to put the operating system and
libre software forward as a standard rapidly. Nearly every single thing
that has been criticised to Ubuntu has through lately positive returns:
* An *interface* that works across platforms, and which delivers
maximum speed at work.
* A *cloud* infrastructure that makes experience across devices very
coherent, as these devices belonged to the same machine.
* A massive *deployment* of the operating system.
* Interest from the *gaming* industry in delivering titles to Linux.
In fact, Steam and Source games work now without any errors at a
stable performance in Saucy.
* Interest in *GPUs* developers in greatly improving their drivers,
both proprietary and libre.
* The ability to *maintain* the computer by the user itself, without
extra wasteful steps to configure it.
🐞*For bugs, a mini gun is being baked*
And what is left and we're *working* on it right now, and I have notice,
is the abilities to:
* *Automatically* test and manage bugs.
* *Smoke test* for bugs before launching a disk image.
* Have a simple, lean and coherent *manual bug and quality
management*; accessible to any kind of contributor.
* *Launch* stable releases of Ubuntu every a while.
So when this gets a little *more mature*, it seems the situation with
bugs will be very different. And with mature I mean *months*.
🍻*Hype and a cup made a hiccup*
I think at the end the real discussion is about that people somehow
feels like being *manipulated* by social media and marketing. I have to
say that, in my opinion, Ubuntu is being advertised as more polished
than actually is; and this is where I think marketing went wrong and
somehow dishonest.
On the other hand, without excusing this point, I see the *intention*
has been always good: making free software the standard, liberating
computing, and showing that people can live working at it.
Regards ☕
El 13/02/14 23:54, John escribió:
>
> Hello all. My name is John.
>
> While I have been following behind the scenes stuff with Ubuntu since
> the beginning, it's very rare that I reply to anything on a mailing
> list. With that said, I have a thought or two.
>
> First, how does *2 days* constitute a week in reference to "Bug Week?"
> Last time I checked, a week was 7 days, or 5 days if you were to go
> the work/school days route.
>
> Second, why does bug smashing have to be limited to a "week?"
> Shouldn't bugs be getting smashed as soon as humanly possible, no
> matter when it is?
>
> Papercuts is a good forum, but "Bug Week" sounds like cheerleaders
> standing on the sidelines rooting for their team when they are down by
> 10 points with little time left on the clock.
>
> Something isn't right here. I will agree that the notification of the
> event gives little to no time for people to prepare. The organizers do
> use a public calendar, right? Better future planning is needed instead
> of scrambling at the last minute.
>
> I'm not a programmer, so fixing bugs is something I can't do myself. I
> do however, like to test new software, break it, give the developers
> back the little pieces and tell them how it broke so they can fix it.
>
> Reporting bugs can be fun, albeit a bit frustrating when the app
> doesn't work as advertised. People get discouraged when apps don't
> function as intended and move on to another distro or even back to
> Windows.
>
> I hope I haven't bitten off more than I can chew with my statements,
> but this is what I've seen here for years.
>
> -John
> BaD_CrC @ Freenode
>
> On Feb 11, 2014 12:35 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella"
> <es20490446e at gmail.com <mailto:es20490446e at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into
> consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable
> of all releases in alpha stage.
>
> On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite
> unsuccessful. I thought in the worst scenario, because launching
> it so soon, whe will be at least four people participating; but we
> just where two. On the other hand, over a hundred bugs; so it
> wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier P.L.
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Echilicuil> for being so supportive.
>
> Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next
> time we do better. Please tell me the following, although the
> possible answer doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what
> has being missed in the event:
>
> * *Why* you choose not to participate?
> * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Alberto
>>
>> Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> As said
>>> <http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000017.html> <http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000017.html> by Joel
>>> Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well
>>> made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable
>>> release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker
>>> <https://errors.ubuntu.com/> <https://errors.ubuntu.com/>.
>>>
>>> ...
>> Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the
>> orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most
>> stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line).
>>
>> I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is
>> unlabelled, which is itself a bug!<http://launchpad.net/bugs/1237499> <http://launchpad.net/bugs/1237499>
>>
>> Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than
>> other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from
>> before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to
>> the current tracker.
>>
>> I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, you
>> could give more advance notice that they're happening.
>>
>> Cheers
>> - --
>> mpt
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V
>> 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+
>> =e5mV
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Elaunchpad-users>
> Post to : launchpad-users at lists.launchpad.net
> <mailto:launchpad-users at lists.launchpad.net>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Elaunchpad-users>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20140214/b2be15b1/attachment.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list