[Ubuntu Wiki] Update of "Bugs/Importance" by amoog
Vishnoo
vish at ubuntu.com
Sun Apr 17 05:48:06 UTC 2011
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 23:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 04/16/2011 11:06 AM, Ubuntu Wiki wrote:
> > Dear Wiki user,
> >
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification.
> >
> > The following page has been changed by amoog:
> > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance?action=diff&rev1=28&rev2=29
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > * A bug that has an easy [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/work-around|work-around]]
> > * Ones that affect unusual configurations or uncommon hardware
> > * A bug that has a moderate impact on a non-core application
> > - * A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of an application
> > + * A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of a non-core application
> > * '''Medium''': most bugs are of medium importance, examples are:
> > * A bug that has a moderate impact on a core application.
> > * A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application.
> > * A bug which impacts accessibility of a non-core application.
> > + * A usability issue that does not limit the functionality of a core application.
> > * A problem with a non-essential hardware component (network card, camera, webcam, music player, sound card, power management feature, printer, etc.)
> > * '''High''': A bug which fulfills one of the following criteria:
> > * Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
>
> Do we want to make a distinction between core and non-core for cosmetic
> bugs?
>
> Micah
>
IMO, not necessary. That addition kinda seems to make the importance
guidelines a bit more complex for a new triager.
--
Cheers,
Vish
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list