[Ubuntu Wiki] Update of "Bugs/Importance" by amoog

Vishnoo vish at ubuntu.com
Sun Apr 17 05:48:06 UTC 2011


On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 23:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 04/16/2011 11:06 AM, Ubuntu Wiki  wrote:
> > Dear Wiki user,
> > 
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification.
> > 
> > The following page has been changed by amoog:
> > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance?action=diff&rev1=28&rev2=29
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     * A bug that has an easy [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/work-around|work-around]]
> >     * Ones that affect unusual configurations or uncommon hardware
> >     * A bug that has a moderate impact on a non-core application
> > -   * A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of an application
> > +   * A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of a non-core application
> >    * '''Medium''':  most bugs are of medium importance, examples are:
> >     * A bug that has a moderate impact on a core application.
> >     * A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application.
> >     * A bug which impacts accessibility of a non-core application.
> > +   * A usability issue that does not limit the functionality of a core application.
> >     * A problem with a non-essential hardware component (network card, camera, webcam, music player, sound card, power management feature, printer, etc.)
> >    * '''High''': A bug which fulfills one of the following criteria:
> >     * Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
> 
> Do we want to make a distinction between core and non-core for cosmetic
> bugs?
> 
> Micah
> 

IMO, not necessary. That addition kinda seems to make the importance
guidelines a bit more complex for a new triager.

-- 
Cheers,
Vish





More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list