New Wiki Structure Proposal

[Brian Murray]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Draycen DeCator wrote:
> Initially I planned on "Special Bugs" having its own page since it seems
> like there would be enough information to justify it, but it could easily be
> added to "Types of Bugs" if we start laying out the information and it ends
> up making more sense there. Definitely something we'll have to think about.
> 
> I also really like the idea of having a "Basic" and "Advanced" section for
> the "How to Triage" page, but what things would we want to classify as
> basic? Commenting and confirming definitely, but what about finding
> duplicates?

Yes to commenting and confirming.  No, to finding duplicates as it can
vary in difficulty depending on the particular bug.

> Or assigning packages to bugs with no package?

This too can vary in difficulty however I think it is easier to know
when you are uncertain.  (I mean people are much more likely to make
mistakes when marking duplicates than assigning packages.)  So as long
as we make it clear that if one is uncertain to ask for help it seems
appropriate for the "Basic" section.

> I feel like an argument can be made for those two, and possibly other
> actions, to be considered basic or advanced.

Other "Basic" actions include:

Documenting steps to recreate the bug in the description
Modifying the bug title to concise and descriptive

Thanks,
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20110412/51a4d8b1/attachment.pgp>