Nautilus Adoption statistics recording started

[Bruno Girin]

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 20:00 +0100, Sense Hofstede wrote:
> > If the idea is to highlight what areas need to be worked on, is it
> > possible also filter the number of bugs that need to be forwarded
> > upstream please?
> >
> Good idea! I'll make the script fetch that information as well.
> However, please keep in mind that it can only count the bugs with open
> tasks for upstream; bugs that should be forwarded upstream but don't
> have a task open won't show up on these stats.

Do you mean you can't implement natural language parsing of the comments
to check if it needs to be forwarded upstream? ;-)

Another thought I just add that may or may not be useful: on the grounds
that most Nautilus bugs should be forwarded upstream at one point or
another, would it be useful to also count bugs that are in the "Triaged"
state but have no upstream task?

> 
> > On the web page, it would also be nice if next to each category, you had
> > a link to the list of bugs in that category on LP, just to make it
> > easier to get to them.
> >
> A few from those links should be in the task descriptions but were
> broken by my wrong use of MoinMoin variables. I'll clean the task
> descriptions and create a separate section on the wiki page for links.

Excellent!

> 
> EndOfReply
> 
> The AdoptionTeam for Nautilus is ready now and if you haven't started
> with triaging already you should now! I'll blog about the project, but
> what we need most are people that are willing to do a lot of work and
> that can do a lot of work. Those numbers of open bugs need to go down!

Absolutely right. I've started triaging but not as many as I would like.
Next on my list is to set up a couple of VMs to test the most complex of
those bugs.

Bruno