A reminder to use the regression tags

[Brian Murray]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:48:17PM +0100, Markus Korn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Henrik Nilsen Omma
> <henrik at canonical.com> wrote:
> > We have a pretty good system now for flagging and escalating them on to
> > the developers [1][2] but I want to spread the word about actually using
> > the tags in every-day triage. When you read a bug please keep in mind
> > whether it may represent a regression and tag it accordingly.
> What do you think about adding a separate "regression testing" section
> to [0], with small description of each tag and links to [1]/[2].
> Bugs/Tags also has some other 'regression*' tags like 'regression' or
> 'regression-retracer', can they be removed or should they be added to
> the QATeam/RegressionTracking page?

It looks like Henrik added this to the Bugs/Tags page as per your
suggestion.
 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20090305/d46ffab9/attachment.sig>