apport-crash bugs without a package
markus korn
thekorn at gmx.de
Wed Oct 8 09:18:29 UTC 2008
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Recently the apport-retracer was modified[0] to assign apport-crash bug
> reports without a package to the package for the application that
> crashed as a part of the retracing process. I believe most of these
> bugs ended up without a package because the reporter was removing them
> as they reported them, however the retracer will now fix a mistake like
> that. So if we could review the current list of apport-crash bugs
> without a package[1] that'd be helpful. Additionally, I promise this
> pile of bugs won't grow. Well, it really shouldn't....
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/269045
> [1] http://tinyurl.com/5yhs6c
>
Hi,
I worked a bit on this list this morning, and might continue if noone
else does later today.
There are a few bugs on the list where I'm not sure what to do:
* https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/209521
* https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/222665
* https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/223890
* https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/225874
they were all filed against twisted, but the target was removed with a
comment like "not a bug in twisted", without any alternative package.
They are all about the
"vodafone-mobile-connect-card-driver-for-linux"-application, which is,
as far as I can see not part of any ubuntu repository. So: what todo
about them: marking as invalid because they are about 3rd party apps?
Markus
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list