about apport retrace

[Greg Grossmeier]

Emmet Hikory wrote:
>     When using these definitions, can we extend "Confirmed" to mean
> that it is not only reproducible, but that the bug report contains
> sufficient information to allow someone previously unfamiliar with the
> ug to reproduce it?  This is distinct from having a solution, but
> rather just a sufficient description of the method to reproduce that
> someone could accurately identify the problem (and so complete
> triage).

+1

I like the idea of adding a TEST CASE section to confirmed bugs (for 
bugs which aren't obvious, of course).