about apport retrace

[Niels Egberts]

Good that there is an agreement on what "confirmed" means. And it seems the
most logical way.

But back to my bug report, another user has confirmed my bug report, but
there is not a retrace (yet). What is the "official" answer on this?
New/Confirmed/Needs Information?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Greg Grossmeier <greg.grossmeier at gmail.com>
wrote:

> More information. From Brian and I's conversation this morning:
>
> 13:04 <  bdmurray> greg-g: re Confirmed I'm not sure why I wrote that
> and think it should be changed / removed too
> 13:04 <    greg-g> bdmurray: /me nods
> 13:05 <  bdmurray> I'll fix it later tonight then
> 13:06 <    greg-g> bdmurray: just need to remove that line right?
> 13:07 <  bdmurray> greg-g: well or something like another user has
> experienced the bug report
> 13:08 <  bdmurray> whether it be a duplicate or a comment from
> additional user with the problem
> 13:10 <  bdmurray> greg-g: so if you've a brilliant way to word that
> feel free
> 13:10 <  bdmurray> greg-g: otherwise I'll check it out tonight
>
> --
> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20080717/97c2b492/attachment.html>