about apport retrace

[Mackenzie Morgan]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Greg Grossmeier
<greg.grossmeier at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Niels Egberts <niels.egberts at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> When someone said he had the same problem, I marked the bug as confirmed.
>>
>> Which is wrong.  Confirmed, confusingly, means that the info necessary
>> to fix the bug is there.  It sounds like it should mean someone
>> reproduced it, I know.
>
> Just to clarify before too many bugs are changed: the above is not correct.
>
> See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
> Quote:
> "Confirmed:
>    * Someone believes that that the report describes a genuine bug in enough
> detail that a developer could start working on a fix
<snip>
> I believe you are thinking of Triaged, Mackenzie.  From that same page,
> under Triaged: "Use this when you are confident that it should be looked at
> by a developer and has enough information"

Actually, it's that "enough detail that a developer could start
working on a fix" which made me think simply having had one person
reproduce it doesn't count.  What's the difference between that
requirement for Confirmed and the requirement for Triaged?  They look
like they mean the same thing to me.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
apt-get moo