Propose to make the need to have importance set on Triaged bugs rather than on Confirmed bugs for kernel bug policy
Brian Murray
brian at ubuntu.com
Mon Aug 6 18:35:04 BST 2007
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:05:04PM -0400, Paul Dufresne wrote:
> As a member of BugSquad (not QA) team, I sometimes have to ask on IRC
> for a member of QA team to 'at least' set the importance of a kernel
> bug that I am to the point of confirming. This is because of the rule
> in:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies that says that 'Confirmed
> bugs should have importance set'.
>
> I think it would not change much if the rule was rather: 'Triaged bugs
> should have importance set'.
> Then I could easily confirm bugs on kernel, without asking help.
This makes a lot of sense and I have updated the Kernel Team Bug Policy
to reflect your idea. Thank you for bringing it to everyone's attention.
--
Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070806/f9d3d5bb/attachment.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list