Proposition: Restrict dupe-ing ability to bugsquad members
Jonh Wendell
wendell_listas at bani.com.br
Sun Oct 22 12:30:39 UTC 2006
Em Dom, 2006-10-22 às 13:16 +0100, Vassilis Pandis escreveu:
> Hi,
>
>
> A few days ago a bug triager (who's not on the bugsquad or QA team) silently marked a number of
> ubiquity bugs as duplicates. The bugs were wrongly marked, and no explanation was given by the
> triager as to why they were marked, possible workarounds (etc. i.e. no comment whatsoever). I
> unmarked these bug reports and asked him on a bug report on what criteria the bugs were duped, but
> haven't received a reply yet.
>
> I am thus proposing that the ability to mark as duplicates is restricted to only members of the
> bugsquad. Tracking down bugs that were wrongly marked as duplicates is time consuming and causes
> an uneccessary amount of bugmail. As a reporter, I would feel offended if my bug report was marked
> as a dupe without even receiving an explanation. The rationale behind this is that marking a bug
> as a duplicate is not something that a total newbie should be doing (can they read backtraces?
> have they taken the time to read the relevant wiki pages ?).
>
> The only case as far as I can tell, in which such a restriction is not desirable is when the same
> reporter accidentally submits the bug report twice. This is quite a marginal case though and can
> be treated easily.
>
> Finally, this incident only makes me worry: What will be done in the case of a malicious "attack"
> on Malone? If suddenly somebody (for whatever reason) decided to mark 100 bugs as duplicates,
> confirm/reject another 100, we would evidently have a problem. (I know this has been discussed in
> the past, but after this I feel obliged to raise it again)
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Pandis
I agree completely.
--
Jonh Wendell
jonh.wendell at gmail.com (MSN / Google Talk)
Linux User #114432
https://launchpad.net/people/wendell
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list