allowing backports into non-LTS releases

[Thomas Ward]

Same with Mantic.

On 10/30/23 15:09, Thomas Ward wrote:
> The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I 
> forget did we give that an exception?
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
>> I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I 
>> have a server related task for that to work on.
>>
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ubuntu-backports <ubuntu-backports-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com> On 
>> Behalf Of Dan Streetman
>> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
>> To: Backports Discussion <ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com>
>> Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
>>
>> I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - 
>> backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow 
>> this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases 
>> as well.
>>
>> As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic 
>> queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next 
>> month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over 
>> the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- 
>> ubuntu-backports mailing list
>> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports