allowing backports into non-LTS releases

[Thomas Ward]

The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget 
did we give that an exception?


Thomas


On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
> I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a server related task for that to work on.
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ubuntu-backports <ubuntu-backports-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com> On Behalf Of Dan Streetman
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
> To: Backports Discussion <ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
>
> I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well.
>
> As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports