allowing backports into non-LTS releases

[Dan Streetman]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:10 PM Thomas Ward <teward at thomas-ward.net> wrote:
>
> The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget
> did we give that an exception?

well that's what I meant, should we continue with the 'exception only'
policy for backports to non-LTS releases? Or should we allow optional
backports to non-LTS releases?

Personally I think it makes sense to allow backports to non-LTS
releases without needing to get specific exception approval...

>
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
> > I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a server related task for that to work on.
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ubuntu-backports <ubuntu-backports-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com> On Behalf Of Dan Streetman
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
> > To: Backports Discussion <ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com>
> > Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
> >
> > I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well.
> >
> > As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-backports mailing list
> > ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports