Which packages do you want backported?

[John Dong]

ah, that sounds a lot more sane :)

On 8/9/05, Martin Meredith <martin at sourceguru.net> wrote:
> 
> Sorry... let me try and be more specific..
> 
> Which packages that are ALREADY in the OLD backports do you want
> bakcported (so we know whehter things were just a one-time request or not)
> 
> Sorry - half asleep :D
> 
> John Dong wrote:
> > Martin, I don't think this is a good idea... I'd much rather use a bug
> > tracker, or we're gonna get swamped responding to backports requests,
> > especially since 90% of requests aren't valid in the first place!
> >
> > On 8/9/05, *Martin Meredith* <martin at sourceguru.net
> > <mailto:martin at sourceguru.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Please reply with the names of packages you would like to see
> > backported, there's a lot of people on this list, and we need input
> > from
> > you guys to help us do our job
> >
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-backports mailing list
> > ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> > <mailto:ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com>
> > http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20050809/c3bedf49/attachment.htm