ah, that sounds a lot more sane :)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/9/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Martin Meredith</b> <<a href="mailto:martin@sourceguru.net">martin@sourceguru.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Sorry... let me try and be more specific..<br><br>Which packages that are ALREADY in the OLD backports do you want<br>bakcported (so we know whehter things were just a one-time request or not)<br><br>Sorry - half asleep :D
<br><br>John Dong wrote:<br>> Martin, I don't think this is a good idea... I'd much rather use a bug<br>> tracker, or we're gonna get swamped responding to backports requests,<br>> especially since 90% of requests aren't valid in the first place!
<br>><br>> On 8/9/05, *Martin Meredith* <<a href="mailto:martin@sourceguru.net">martin@sourceguru.net</a><br>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:martin@sourceguru.net">martin@sourceguru.net</a>>> wrote:<br>>
<br>> Please reply with the names of packages you would like to see<br>> backported, there's a lot of people on this list, and we need input<br>> from<br>> you guys to help us do our job<br>>
<br>><br>> --<br>> ubuntu-backports mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com">
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>> <a href="http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports">http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports</a><br>><br>><br>><br>><br><br>
<br><br>--<br>ubuntu-backports mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports">http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
</a><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>